Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review
 
 

   

GENEALOGICAL NOTES AND ANECDOTES

   

   
 
 

Jefferson Davis

 
 
 

Woodrow Wilson

 
 

Bury the purple dream
Of the America we have not been,
The tropic empire seeking the warm sea,
The last foray of Aristocracy,
The pastoral rebellion of the earth,
Against machines, against the Age of Steam.

[paraphrased from Stephen Vincent Benet,
John Brown's Body
]

 


ON NEOPURITANISM

By the end of the twentieth century, a species of neopuritanism had arisen in the United States according to which many believed it contrary to public good that anyone should display the banners, emblems, or insignia of the long-defunct Confederate States of America. The basis for this point of view is in equation of the Confederate government with the practice of racial slavery, a form of human bondage now universally acknowledged as inconsistent with iustitia naturalis. At least since the French Revolution, it has been axiomatic in Western culture that no-one is or can be a slave, whether by nature or by convention. Thus, in the New World, and by the nineteenth century, property in man survived as a vestigial institution of European colonialism.

Of the eleven states that formed the Confederacy, argument can be made for saying that it was in defense of slavery that South Carolina (seceded 20 December 1860), Mississippi (seceded 9 January 1861), Florida (seceded 10 January 1861), Alabama (seceded 11 January 1861), Georgia (seceded 19 January 1861), Louisiana (seceded 26 January 1861), and Texas (seceded 1 February 1861), following the election of Abraham Lincoln (6 November 1860) and the threat of Republican ascendancy ("Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men") in the fedral legislature, undertook secession from the United States. Argument, however, can also be made for showing that it was not in defense of slavery that Virginia (seceded 17 April 1861), Arkansas (seceded 6 May 1861), Tennessee (seceded 7 May 1861), and North Carolina (seceded 11 May 1861), after Lincoln’s call to arms (15 April 1861) against South Carolina, were moved to depart the United States but that, instead, they were motivated by the principle of voluntary union. These last four states contained nearly half the population of the Confederacy; and, therefore, from its inception, the Confederate States of America were based on mixed intentions.


[Map from D. W. Meinig, The Shaping of America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 Years of History (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993), vol. 2, p. 485. This map distinguishes the Upland South, the Deep South, and the Confederate Territory of Arizona]

Following the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error, versus John F. A. Sandford [60 U. S. 393 (December Term, 1856)], in which Justice Taney had opined that free persons of colour (in Louisiana, gens de couleur libre) "are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States," it seemed plausible that free persons of colour might be deprived of liberty without offense to the fifth amendment of the American constitution. Thus it was that the decision of the Supreme Court provoked the "enslavement crisis" of 1858 - 1860 by which, in the slaveholding states, efforts were made to legalise the enslavement of free persons of colour. But, since no political consensus was discovered in support of any such legislation as would transform freedom into felony, the doctrine of John C. Calhoun that, for all persons of colour, slavery must be a "positive good" was effectively repudiated throughout the South. [See Michael P. Johnson and James L. Roark. Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in the Old South (New York: W. W. Norton, 1984); and see Ira Berlin, Slaves Without Masters: The Free Negro in the Antebellum South (New York: Oxford University Press, 1974).]

If the outcome of the "enslavement crisis" be taken as a crucial test of the South's alliance with slavery, then it appears that the defense of slavery was everywhere equivocal. And this, in the end, is the reason why Patrick Cleburne, Robert E. Lee, Judah P. Benjamin, and Jefferson Davis, with the legislative concurrence of the Confederate Congress, proved their devotion to the South over slavery by advocating continuance of their war for independence on the basis of terminating the "peculiar institution" of property in man. The war, however, that originated as a conflict about secession and not about human bondage, the Union having provoked hostilities with no plan at all for ending slavery, reached its conclusion sooner than did "the peculiar institution." [See Robert F. Durden. The Gray and the Black: The Confederate Debate on Emancipation (Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press, 1972).]

  Georgia, 2 January 1864: Letter from Patrick Cleburne et al. to Joseph E, Johnston et al. [The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, series I, volume LII, pt. 2 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900), pp. 586-592.]:

[2 January 1864]

COMMANDING GENERAL, THE CORPS, DIVISION, BRIGADE, AND REGIMENTAL COMMANDERS OF THE ARMY OF TENNESSEE

General:

Moved by the exigency in which our country is now placed we take the liberty of laying before you, unofficially, our views on the present state of affairs. The subject is so grave, and our views so new, we feel it a duty both to you and the cause that before going further we should submit them for your judgment and receive your suggestions in regard to them. We therefore respectfully ask you to give us an expression of your views in the premises. We have now been fighting for nearly three years, have spilled much of our best blood, and lost, consumed, or thrown to the flames an amount of property equal in value to the specie currency of the world. Through some lack in our system the fruits of our struggles and sacrifices have invariably slipped away from us and left us nothing but long lists of dead and mangled. Instead of standing defiantly on the borders of our territory or harassing those of the enemy, we are hemmed in to-day into less than two-thirds of it, and still the enemy menacingly confronts us at every point with superior forces. Our soldiers can see no end to this state of affairs except in our own exhaustion; hence, instead of rising to the occasion, they are sinking into a fatal apathy, growing weary of hardships and slaughters which promise no results. In this state of things it is easy to understand why there is a growing belief that some black catastrophe is not far ahead of us, and that unless some extraordinary change is soon made in our condition we must overtake it. The consequences of this condition are showing themselves more plainly every day; restlessness of morals spreading everywhere, manifesting itself in the army in a growing disregard for private rights; desertion spreading to a class of soldiers it never dared to tamper with before; military commissions sinking in the estimation of the soldier; our supplies failing; our firesides in ruins. If this state continues much longer we must be subjugated. Every man should endeavor to understand the meaning of subjugation before it is too late. We can give but a faint idea when we say it means the loss of all we now hold most sacred — slaves and all other personal property, lands, homesteads, liberty, justice, safety, pride, manhood. It means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy; that our youth will be trained by Northern school teachers; will learn from Northern school books their version of the war; will be impressed by all the influences of history and education to regard our gallant dead as traitors, our maimed veterans as fit objects for derision. It means the crushing of Southern manhood, the hatred of our former slaves, who will, on a spy system, be our secret police. The conqueror's policy is to divide the conquered into factions and stir up animosity among them, and in training an army of negroes the North no doubt holds this thought in perspective. We can see three great causes operating to destroy us: First, the inferiority of our armies to those of the enemy in point of numbers; second, the poverty of our single source of supply in comparison with his several sources; third, the fact that slavery, from being one of our chief sources of strength at the commencement of the war, has now become, in a military point of view, one of our chief sources of weakness.

The enemy already opposes us at every point with superior numbers, and is endeavoring to make the preponderance irresistible. President Davis, in his recent message, says the enemy "has recently ordered a large conscription and made a subsequent call for volunteers, to be followed, if ineffectual by a still further draft." In addition, the President of the United States announces that "he has already in training an army of 100,000 negroes as good as any troops," and every fresh raid he makes and new slice of territory he wrests from us will add to this force. Every soldier in our army already knows and feels our numerical inferiority to the enemy. Want of men in the field has prevented him from reaping the fruits of his victories, and has prevented him from having the furlough he expected after the last reorganization, and when he turns from the wasting armies in the field to look at the source of supply, he finds nothing in the prospect to encourage him. Our single source of supply is that portion of our white men fit for duty and not now in the ranks. The enemy has three sources of supply: First, his own motley population; secondly, our slaves; and thirdly, Europeans whose hearts are fired into a crusade against us by fictitious pictures of the atrocities of slavery, and who meet no hindrance from their Governments in such enterprise, because these Governments are equally antagonistic to the institution. In touching the third cause, the fact that slavery has become a military weakness, we may rouse prejudice and passion, but the time has come when it would be madness not to look at our danger from every point of view, and to probe it to the bottom. Apart from the assistance that home and foreign prejudice against slavery has given to the North, slavery is a source of great strength to the enemy in a purely military point of view, by supplying him with an army from our granaries; but it is our most vulnerable point, a continued embarrassment, and in some respects an insidious weakness. Wherever slavery is once seriously disturbed, whether by the actual presence or the approach of the enemy, or even by a cavalry raid, the whites can no longer with safety to their property openly sympathize with our cause. The fear of their slaves is continually haunting them, and from silence and apprehension many of these soon learn to wish the war stopped on any terms. The next stage is to take the oath to save property, and they become dead to us, if not open enemies. To prevent raids we are forced to scatter our forces, and are not free to move and strike like the enemy; his vulnerable points are carefully selected and fortified depots. Ours are found in every point where there is a slave to set free. All along the lines slavery is comparatively valueless to us for labor, but of great and increasing worth to the enemy for information. It is an omnipresent spy system, pointing out our valuable men to the enemy, revealing our positions, purposes, and resources, and yet acting so safely and secretly that there is no means to guard against it. Even in the heart of our country, where our hold upon this secret espionage is firmest, it waits but the opening fire of the enemy's battle line to wake it, like a torpid serpent, into venomous activity.

In view of the state of affairs what does our country propose to do? In the words of President Davis "no effort must be spared to add largely to our effective force as promptly as possible. The sources of supply are to be found in restoring to the army all who are improperly absent, putting an end to substitution, modifying the exemption law, restricting details, and placing in the ranks such of the able-bodied men now employed as wagoners, nurses, cooks, and other employe[e]s, as are doing service for which the negroes may be found competent." Most of the men improperly absent, together with many of the exempts and men having substitutes, are now without the Confederate lines and cannot be calculated on. If all the exempts capable of bearing arms were enrolled, it will give us the boys below eighteen, the men above forty-five, and those persons who are left at home to meet the wants of the country and the army, but this modification of the exemption law will remove from the fields and manufactories most of the skill that directed agricultural and mechanical labor, and, as stated by the President, "details will have to be made to meet the wants of the country," thus sending many of the men to be derived from this source back to their homes again. Independently of this, experience proves that striplings and men above conscript age break down and swell the sick lists more than they do the ranks. The portion now in our lines of the class who have substitutes is not on the whole a hopeful element, for the motives that created it must have been stronger than patriotism, and these motives added to what many of them will call breach of faith, will cause some to be not forthcoming, and others to be unwilling and discontented soldiers. The remaining sources mentioned by the President have been so closely pruned in the Army of Tennessee that they will be found not to yield largely. The supply from all these sources, together with what we now have in the field, will exhaust the white race, and though it should greatly exceed expectations and put us on an equality with the enemy, or even give us temporary advantages, still we have no reserve to meet unexpected disaster or to supply a protracted struggle. Like past years, 1864 will diminish our ranks by the casualties of war, and what source of repair is there left us? We therefore see in the recommendations of the President only a temporary expedient, which at the best will leave us twelve months hence in the same predicament we are in now. The President attempts to meet only one of the depressing causes mentioned; for the other two he has proposed no remedy. They remain to generate lack of confidence in our final success, and to keep us moving down hill as heretofore. Adequately to meet the causes which are now threatening ruin to our country, we propose, in addition to a modification of the President's plans, that we retain in service for the war all troops now in service, and that we immediately commence training a large reserve of the most courageous of our slaves, and further that we guarantee freedom within a reasonable time to every slave in the South who shall remain true to the Confederacy in this war. As between the loss of independence and the loss of slavery, we assume that every patriot will freely give up the latter — give up the negro slave rather than be a slave himself. If we are correct in this assumption it only remains to show how this great national sacrifice is, in all human probabilities, to change the current of success and sweep the invader from our country.

Our country has already some friends in England and France, and there are strong motives to induce these nations to recognize and assist us, but they cannot assist us without helping slavery, and to do this would be in conflict with their policy for the last quarter of a century. England has paid hundreds of millions to emancipate her West India slaves and break up the slave-trade. Could she now consistently spend her treasure to reinstate slavery in this country? But this barrier once removed, the sympathy and the interests of these and other nations will accord with our own, and we may expect from them both moral support and material aid. One thing is certain, as soon as the great sacrifice to independence is made and known in foreign countries there will be a complete change of front in our favor of the sympathies of the world. This measure will deprive the North of the moral and material aid which it now derives from the bitter prejudices with which foreigners view the institution, and its war, if continued, will henceforth be so despicable in their eyes that the source of recruiting will be dried up. It will leave the enemy's negro army no motive to fight for, and will exhaust the source from which it has been recruited. The idea that it is their special mission to war against slavery has held growing sway over the Northern people for many years, and has at length ripened into an armed and bloody crusade against it. This baleful superstition has so far supplied them with a courage and constancy not their own. It is the most powerful and honestly entertained plank in their war platform. Knock this away and what is left? A bloody ambition for more territory, a pretended veneration for the Union, which one of their own most distinguished orators (Doctor Beecher in his Liverpool speech) openly avowed was only used as a stimulus to stir up the anti-slavery crusade, and lastly the poisonous and selfish interests which are the fungus growth of the war itself. Mankind may fancy it a great duty to destroy slavery, but what interest can mankind have in upholding this remainder of the Northern war platform? Their interests and feelings will be diametrically opposed to it. The measure we propose will strike dead all John Brown fanaticism, and will compel the enemy to draw off altogether or in the eyes of the world to swallow the Declaration of Independence without the sauce and disguise of philanthropy. This delusion of fanaticism at an end, thousands of Northern people will have leisure to look at home and to see the gulf of despotism into which they themselves are rushing.

The measure will at one blow strip the enemy of foreign sympathy and assistance, and transfer them to the South; it will dry up two of his three sources of recruiting; it will take from his negro army the only motive it could have to fight against the South, and will probably cause much of it to desert over to us; it will deprive his cause of the powerful stimulus of fanaticism, and will enable him to see the rock on which his so-called friends are now piloting him. The immediate effect of the emancipation and enrollment of negroes on the military strength of the South would be: To enable us to have armies numerically superior to those of the North, and a reserve of any size we might think necessary; to enable us to take the offensive, move forward, and forage on the enemy. It would open to us in prospective another and almost untouched source of supply, and furnish us with the means of preventing temporary disaster, and carrying on a protracted struggle. It would instantly remove all the vulnerability, embarrassment, and inherent weakness which result from slavery. The approach of the enemy would no longer find every household surrounded by spies; the fear that sealed the master's lips and the avarice that has, in so many cases, tempted him practically to desert us would alike be removed. There would be no recruits awaiting the enemy with open arms, no complete history of every neighborhood with ready guides, no fear of insurrection in the rear, or anxieties for the fate of loved ones when our armies moved forward. The chronic irritation of hope deferred would be joyfully ended with the negro, and the sympathies of his whole race would be due to his native South. It would restore confidence in an early termination of the war with all its inspiring consequences, and even if contrary to all expectations the enemy should succeed in over-running the South, instead of finding a cheap, ready-made means of holding it down, he would find a common hatred and thirst for vengeance, which would break into acts at every favorable opportunity, would prevent him from settling on our lands, and render the South a very unprofitable conquest. It would remove forever all selfish taint from our cause and place independence above every question of property. The very magnitude of the sacrifice itself, such as no nation has ever voluntarily made before, would appal [sic] our enemies, destroy his spirit and his finances, and fill our hearts with a pride and singleness of purpose which would clothe us with new strength in battle. Apart from all other aspects of the question, the necessity for more fighting men is upon us. We can only get a sufficiency by making the negro share the danger and hardships of the war. If we arm and train him and make him fight for the country in her hour of dire distress, every consideration of principle and policy demand that we should set him and his whole race who side with us free. It is a first principle with mankind that he who offers his life in defense of the State should receive from her in return his freedom and his happiness, and we believe in acknowledgment of this principle. The Constitution of the Southern States has reserved to their respective governments the power to free slaves for meritorious services to the State. It is politic besides. For many years, ever since the agitation of the subject of slavery commenced, the negro has been dreaming of freedom, and his vivid imagination has surrounded that condition with so many gratifications that it has become the paradise of his hopes. To attain it he will tempt dangers and difficulties not exceeded by the bravest soldier in the field. The hope of freedom is perhaps the only moral incentive that can be applied to him in his present condition. It would be preposterous then to expect him to fight against it with any degree of enthusiasm, therefore we must bind him to our cause by no doubtful bonds; we must leave no possible loop-hole for treachery to creep in. The slaves are dangerous now, but armed, trained, and collected in an army they would be a thousand fold more dangerous; therefore when we make soldiers of them we must make free men of them beyond all question, and thus enlist their sympathies also. We can do this more effectually than the North can now do, for we can give the negro not only his own freedom, but that of his wife and child, and can secure it to him in his old home. To do this, we must immediately make his marriage and parental relations sacred in the eyes of the law and forbid their sale. The past legislation of the South concedes that a large free middle class of negro blood, between the master and slave, must sooner or later destroy the institution. If, then, we touch the institution at all, we would do best to make the most of it, and by emancipating the whole race upon reasonable terms, and within such reasonable time as will prepare both races for the change, secure to ourselves all the advantages, and to our enemies all the disadvantages that can arise, both at home and abroad, from such a sacrifice. Satisfy the negro that if he faithfully adheres to our standard during the war he shall receive his freedom and that of his race. Give him as an earnest of our intentions such immediate immunities as will impress him with our sincerity and be in keeping with his new condition, enroll a portion of his class as soldiers of the Confederacy, and we change the race from a dreaded weakness to a position of strength.

Will the slaves fight? The helots of Sparta stood their masters good stead in battle. In the great sea fight of Lepanto where the Christians checked forever the spread of Mohammedanism over Europe, the galley slaves of portions of the fleet were promised freedom, and called on to fight at a critical moment of the battle. They fought well, and civilization owes much to those brave galley slaves. The negro slaves of Saint Domingo, fighting for freedom, defeated their white masters and the French troops sent against them. The negro slaves of Jamaica revolted, and under the name of Maroons held the mountains against their masters for 150 years; and the experience of this war has been so far that half-trained negroes have fought as bravely as many other half-trained Yankees. If, contrary to the training of a lifetime, they can be made to face and fight bravely against their former masters, how much more probable is it that with the allurement of a higher reward, and led by those masters, they would submit to discipline and face dangers?

We will briefly notice a few arguments against this course. It is said Republicanism cannot exist without the institution. Even were this true, we prefer any form of government of which the Southern people may have the molding, to one forced upon us by a conqueror. It is said the white man cannot perform agricultural labor in the South. The experience of this army during the heat of summer from Bowling Green, Ky., to Tupelo, Miss., is that the white man is healthier when doing reasonable work in the open field than at any other time. It is said an army of negroes cannot be spared from the fields. A sufficient number of slaves is now administering to luxury alone to supply the place of all we need, and we believe it would be better to take half the able-bodied men off a plantation than to take the one master mind that economically regulated its operations. Leave some of the skill at home and take some of the muscle to fight with. It is said slaves will not work after they are freed. We think necessity and a wise legislation will compel them to labor for a living. It is said it will cause terrible excitement and some disaffection from our cause. Excitement is far preferable to the apathy which now exists, and disaffection will not be among the fighting men. It is said slavery is all we are fighting for, and if we give it up we give up all. Even if this were true, which we deny, slavery is not all our enemies are fighting for. It is merely the pretense to establish sectional superiority and a more centralized form of government, and to deprive us of our rights and liberties. We have now briefly proposed a plan which we believe will save our country. It may be imperfect, but in all human probability it would give us our independence. No objection ought to outweigh it which is not weightier than independence. If it is worthy of being put in practice it ought to be mooted quickly before the people, and urged earnestly by every man who believes in its efficacy. Negroes will require much training; training will require much time, and there is danger that this concession to common sense may come too late.

  P. R. Cleburne, major-general, commanding division
D. C. Govan, brigadier-general
John E. Murray, colonel, Fifth Arkansas
G. F. Baucum, colonel, Eighth Arkansas
Peter Snyder, lieutenant-colonel, commanding Sixth and Seventh Arkansas
E. Warfield, lieutenant-colonel, Second Arkansas
M. P. Lowrey, brigadier-general
A. B. Hardcastle, colonel, Thirty-second and Forty-fifth Mississippi
F. A. Ashford, major, Sixteenth Alabama
John W. Colquitt, colonel, First Arkansas
Rich. J. Person, major, Third and Fifth Confederate
G. S. Deakins, major, Thirty-fifth and Eighth Tennessee
J. H. Collett, captain, commanding Seventh Texas
J. H. Kelly, brigadier-general, commanding Cavalry Division

23 March 1865: Confederate States of America, General Order No. 14: The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, series IV, volume III (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900), pp. 1161 - 1162:

 


GENERAL ORDERS
No. 14

} ADJT. AND INSP. GENERAL’S OFFICE,
. Richmond, Va., March 23, 1865

.I. The following act of Congress and regulations are published for the information and direction of all concerned:

 

AN ACT to increase the military force of the Confederate States.

The Congress of the Confederate States of America do enact, That, in order to provide additional forces to repel invasion, maintain the rightful possession of the Confederate States, secure their independence, and preserve their institutions, the President be, and he is hereby, authorized to ask for and accept from the owners of slaves, the services of such number of able-bodied negro men as he may deem expedient, for and during the war, to perform military service in whatever capacity he may direct.

SEC. 2. That the General-in-Chief be authorized to organize the said slaves into companies, battalions, regiments, and brigades, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary of War may prescribe, and to be commanded by such officers as the President may appoint.

SEC. 3. That while employed in the service the said troops shall receive the same rations, clothing, and compensation as are allowed to other troops in the same branch of the service.

SEC. 4. That if, under the previous sections of this act, the President shall not be able to raise a sufficient number of troops to prosecute the war successfully and maintain the sovereignty of the States and the independence of the Confederate States, then he is hereby authorized to call on each State, whenever he thinks it expedient, for her quota of 300,000 troops, in addition to those subject to military service under existing laws, or so many thereof as the President may deem necessary to be raised from such classes of the population, irrespective of color, in each State, as the proper authorities thereof may determine: Provided, That not more than twenty-five per cent. of the male slaves between the ages of eighteen and forty-five, in anyState, shall be called for under the provisions of this act.

SEC. 5. That nothing in this act shall be construed to authorize a change in the relation which the said slaves shall bear toward their owners, except by consent of the owners and of the States in which they may reside, and in pursuance of the laws thereof. Approved March 13, 1865.

II. The recruiting service under this act will be conducted under the supervision of the Adjutant and Inspector General, according to the regulations for the recruiting service of the Regular Army, in so far as they are applicable, and except when special directions may be given by the War Department.

III. There will be assigned or appointed for each State an officer who will be charged with the collection, enrollment, and disposition of all the recruits that may be obtained under the first section of this act. One or more general depots will be established in each State and announced in orders, and a suitable number of officers will be detailed for duty in the staff departments at the depots. There will be assigned at each general depot a quartermaster, commissary, and surgeon, and the headquarters of the superintendent will be at the principal depot in the State. The proper officers to aid the superintendent in enlisting, mustering, and organizing the recruits will be assigned by orders from this office or by the General-in-Chief.

IV. The enlistment of colored persons under this act will be made upon printed forms, to be furnished for the purpose, similar to those established for the regular service. They will be executed in duplicate, one copy to be returned to this office for file. No slave will be accepted as a recruit unless with his own consent and with the approbation of his master by a written instrument conferring, as far as he may, the rights of a freedman, and which will be filed with the superintendent. The enlistments will be made for the war, and the effect of the enlistment will be to place the slave in the military service conformably to this act. The recruits will be organized at the camps in squads and companies, and will be subject to the orders of the General-in-Chief nuder the second section of this act.

V. The superintendent in each State will cause a report to be made on the first Monday of every month showing the expenses of the previous month, the number of recruits at the various depots in the State, the number that has been sent away, and the destination of each. His report will show the names of all the slaves, recruited, with their age, description, and the names of their masters. One copy will be sent to the General-in-Chief and one to the Adjutant and Inspector General.

VI. The appointment of officers to the companies to be formed of the recruits aforesaid will be made by the President.

VII. To facilitate the raising of volunteer companies, officers recruiting therefor are authorized to muster their men into service as soon as enrolled. As soon as enrolled and mustered, the men will be sent, with descriptive lists, to the depots of rendezvous, at which they will be instructed until assigned for service in the field. When the organization of any company remains incomplete at the expiration of the time specified for its organization, the companies or detachments already mustered into service will be assigned to other organizations at the discretion of the General-in-Chief.

VIII. It is not the intention of the President to grant any authority for raising regiments or brigades. The only organizations to be perfected at the depots or camps of instructions are those of companies and (in exceptional cases where the slaves are of one estate) of battalions consisting of four companies, and the only authority to be issued will be for the raising of companies or the aforesaid special battalions of four companies. All larger organizations will be left for future action as experience may determine.

IX. All officers who may be employed in the recruiting service, under the provisions of this act, or who may be appointed to the command of troops raised under it, or who may hold any staff appoint- ment in connection with them, are enjoined to a provident, considerate, and humane attention to whatever concerns the health, comfort, instruction, and discipline of those troops, and to the uniform observance of kindness, forbearance, and indulgence in their treatment of them, and especially that they will protect them from injustice and oppression.

By order: S. COOPER, Adjutant and Inspector General.

The principle embodied in the letter from Patrick Cleburne et al. to Joseph E, Johnston et al. and in CSA General Order No. 14 is that, since courage is a virtue inconsistent with slavery, no person exercising valor in defense of his country may justly be deemed a slave.

In contrast to CSA General Order No. 14, authorised by President Jefferson Davis, USA General Order No. 11, issued by Maj. Gen. Ulysses Simpson Grant from Holly Springs, Mississippi on 17 December 1862 deserves serious reflection [The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, series I, volume XVII, part II (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900), p. 424]:


GENERAL ORDERS
No. 11

} HDQRS. 13TH A. C., DEPT. OF THE TENN.,
. Holly Springs, December 17, 1862
 
The Jews, as a class violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department and also department orders, are hereby expelled from the department (that is, from the Union's military Department of the Tennessee which included Kentucky, Tennesse, and Mississippi) within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this order.

Post commanders will see that all of this class of people be furnished passes and required to leave, and any one returning after such notification will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permit from headquarters.

No passes will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.

By order of Maj. Gen. U. S. Grant:

JNO. A. RAWLINS, Assistant Adjutant-General.

Grant's General Order No. 11 came in the aftermath of an order that, from LaGrange, Mississippi, he had issued 10 November 1862 [The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, series I, volume XVII, part II (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900), p. 337]:

 

LA GRANGE, November 10, 1862.

General WEBSTER, Jackson, Tenn.:

Give orders to all the conductors on the road that no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the railroad southward from any point. They may go north and be encouraged in it; but they are such an intolerable nuisance that the department must be purged of them.

U. S. GRANT,
Major-General

About Grant's directives against Jews, comment hardly seems necessary.

On 14 May 1865, from the doorstep of his father's house in Augusta, Georgia, Thomas Woodrow Wilson, then eight years of age, was an eyewitness to the forced transportation of Jefferson Davis and Alexander Stephens, both as captives of the Union army, to their sites of military imprisonment, Davis at Fortress Monroe and Stephens at Fort Warren. And it was Wilson who, as a child of the Confederacy and as the 28th president of the United States, conveyed the permanent legacy of the Confederate States to the world as a whole by his enunciation, in 1918, of the principle of self-determination for all nations, without annexation and without indemnity, and by his effort to institutionalise that principle in the League of Nations. From the record, thus, of the twentieth century, marked as it was by numerous wars of national liberation, it is clear that the principle of self-determination — which was the constant aim of the Confederate government as the maintenance of slavery was not — was and has been a force vastly more potent throughout the world than, for example, were the global imperatives of Marxism-Leninism.

   

As is mentioned elsewhere at this Web site, there was a connection of family between John Calhoun Cox, whose name, in the annals of the Fifth Texas Regiment, Hood’s Brigade, is synonymous with courage, and Gen. John Brown Gordon, the hero of Confederate Georgia who, among other things, was the commander and patron of Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve, the exemplar of classical scholarship and the founder, at Johns Hopkins University, of the American Philological Association.

The following remarks, concerning the display of Confederate banners, are taken from John Brown Gordon, Reminiscences of the Civil War (New York, Charles Scribner's: 1904):

  "The heartstrings of the mother, woven around the grave of her lost child, will never be severed while she lives; but does that hinder the continued flow of maternal devotions to those who are left her? The South's affections are bound, with links that cannot be broken, around the graves of her sons who fell in her defense and to the mementos and memories of the great struggle; but does that fact lessen her loyalty to the proud emblem of a reunited country? Does her unparalleled defense of the now dead Confederacy argue less readiness to battle for the ever-living Republic, in the making and the administering of which she bore so conspicuous a part?

"If those unhappy patriots who find a scarecrow in every faded, riddled Confederate flag would delve deeper into the philosophy of human nature, or rise higher, say to the plane on which McKinley stood, they would be better satisfied with their Southern countrymen, with Southern sentiment, with the breadth and strength of the unobtrusive but sincere Southern patriotism. They would see that man is so constituted, the immutable laws of our being are such, that to stifle the sentiment and extinguish the hallowed memories of a people is to destroy their manhood.

"The unseemly things which occurred in the great conflict between the States should be forgotten, or at least forgiven, and no longer permitted to disturb complete harmony between North and South. All American youth in all sections should be taught to hold in perpetual remembrance all that was great and good on both sides; to comprehend the inherited convictions for which saintly women suffered and patriotic men died; to recognize the unparalleled carnage as proof of unrivaled courage; to appreciate the singular absence of all personal animosity and the frequent manifestation between those brave antagonists of a good-fellowship such as had never before been witnessed between hostile armies. It will be a glorious day for our country when all the children within its borders shall learn that four years of fratricidal war between the North and the South was waged by neither with criminal or unworthy intent, but by both to protect what they conceived to be threatened rights and imperiled liberty; that the issues which divided the sections were born when the Republic was born, and were forever buried in an ocean of fraternal blood."
   
 
   
   

OLD FORT PLANTATION:
FROM BONDAGE TO FREEDOM


OLD FORT PLANTATION,
FOUR MILES FROM BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA, MARCH 1862

[United States Library of Congress:
LC-B8171-152-A]

In March 1862, Timothy H. O'Sullivan photographed this family of slaves at Old Fort Plantation in Beaufort County, South Carolina. By the martial decree of Abraham Lincoln, this family was emancipated on 1 January 1863.

The proprietor of Old Fort Plantation was John Joyner Smith, who was born in South Carolina in 1789.

About John Joyner Smith, from Robert E. H. Peeples, An Index to Hilton Head Island Names (Before the Contemporary Development), p. 23:

"The underwater sand bar, exposed at low tide, which extends outward into the Atlantic from the northeastern corner of Hilton Head, has long been designated Joyner Bank in honor of sea Captain John Joiner who died March 9, 1796 at his plantation near Beaufort. He had moved to Carolina from Frederica, Georgia in 1750 and was in command of a scout boat from 1754 until the boats were no longer necessary at which time he became a planter. St. Helena’s Parish Register records that his wife Phebe (from England) died of ‘poison’ in July 1754 and that he married in January 1755 Anne, daughter of Captain Richard and Anne Wigg; she predeceased him by two days. Although he had several sons and daughters, he left only one grandchild, John Joyner Smith, by a daughter Margaret who married Archibold Smith in 1789 and died in 1795. John Joyner Smith married in 1813 Mary Gibbes Barnwell (1 February 1795 - 31 December 1853), eldest daughter of Col. Edward Barnwell, and built a magnificent home on the bay which remains one of Beaufort’s treasurers; they died childless. A map drawn by James Cook in 1766 notes that it was 'approved by Mr. Joiner (sic), twenty years a pilot in that place.'"

As of 1 June 1860, John Joyner Smith estimated the value of his real estate at $25,000 and of his personal estate at $50,000. His slaves were numbered at 86 males, ranging in age from 1 to 80 years, and at 88 females, ranging in age from 1 to 72 years. The principal crop at Old Fort Plantation was cotton.


OLD FORT PLANTATION, 1863
[United States Library of Congress:
PR-002-347.20]

The house pictured above is not the "magnificent home on the bay" that Peeples mentioned in An Index to Hilton Head Island Names. The "magnificent home" is located, in Beaufort, at 400 Wilmington Street and was formerly entered through its façade on Bay Street. The house at Old Fort Plantation is no longer extant. "Old Fort" refers to Fort Frederick, constructed by the British Army in 1735 for the defense of Port Royal Harbour. The dilapidated walls of Fort Frederick can still be seen on what had been the plantation of John Joyner Smith. Since 29 April 1949, the site has been occupied by the United States Naval Hospital, Beaufort, South Carolina.


Detail of the Map of Port Royal Harbour by James Cook (1773)
[James Cook, A Map of the Province of South Carolina with all the Rivers, Creeks, Bays, Inletts, Islands, Inland Navigation, Soundings, Time of High Water on the Sea Coast, Roads, Marshes, Ferrys, Bridges, Swamps, Parishes Churches, Towns, Townships; Country Parish District and Provincial Lines. Humbly inscribed to the Hon.ble Lawlins Lownds Esqr.1 Speaker & the rest of the Members of the Hon.ble the Commons House of Assembly of the Province by their most Obedt. & faithfull Servt Jams Cook. Thos. Bowen, sculpt. 1773. (with six inset maps)]

1. Hon.ble Lawlins Lownds Esqr.: "Hon.ble Lawlins Lownds Esqr." was Rawlins Lowndes, Chief Justice of the Royal Province of South Carolina and second President of the State of South Carolina, about whom see The War of Regulation: John Harvey versus David Robinson.

   

EMBLEMS OF HUMAN BONDAGE


A Relic of Urban Slavery:
Slave Tag No. 508, Issued in Charleston, South Carolina in 1821
Image courtesy of the South Carolina State Museum

Another Relic of Urban Slavery:
Slave Tag Stamped for a "House Servant" in 1800, Obverse and Reverse Views
Images by Bill Ladd

This octagonal slave tag, stamped on copper, was discovered by Bill Ladd in the yard of his home in South Carolina in the summer of 1982. The reverse of the tag is stamped "ATMAR," the mark of Ralph Atmar, Jr. who, in Charleston, operated as a silversmith from 1793 to 1803 in partnership with James Monk as the firm of Atmar & Monk which, in 1799, was located at 20 Broad Street. Atmar was born 16 December 1767 in Charleston of parents who had emigrated from Kingston-upon-Hull, England. On 4 June 1792, he was married to Elizabeth Freer (27 April 1773, Charleston, South Carolina - 1812, Charleston, South Carolina), in Charleston, at the Independent Congregational Church. Atmar died in Charleston in 1807.
   
   
   

CONFEDERATE SCRIP

Confederate Note, Montgomery Issue, No. 265, Issued 2 May 1861
[Criswell Type 4]

This early example of Confederate scrip was engraved and printed by the National Bank Note Company of New York to a quantity of 1606.

The central image, which depicts slaves hoeing cotton, shows that the Confederacy had few reservations, if any, about advertising the basis of its wealth. And, as it is altogether clear, had there been no money in it, no-one would ever have practiced slavery.

Confederate Interest-Bearing Note, Richmond Issue, No. 108723, Issued 15 December 1862
[Criswell Type 41]

This later example of Confederate scrip was engraved and printed by Keatinge and Ball, Columbia, South Carolina to an approximate quantity of 678,600. The precise quantity is arguable. For this note, denominated at $100, interest was to be paid at the rate of two cents per day.

The central image was copied from that employed previously by the National Bank Note Company of New York for the Montgomery issue of $100. The copy is not exact.

The image, at the lower left, is of the very grim John Caldwell Calhoun, commonly regarded as the source of the Confederacy's essential principles. He was, in fact, the namesake of John Calhoun Cox.

The image, on the right, is of Columbia bearing the wreath of victory, a symbol of the Confederacy's aspirations to independence.

Private Scrip, No. 19A, Issued by Keatinge & Ball
Columbia, South Carolina, 15 March 1864

Keatinge & Ball, the principal engraver to the Confederate treasury and post office, evidently dealt with the problem of fiat-money inflation by printing its own currency the nominal value of which appears to have been supported by its holdings of Confederate treasury notes which, in theory, should have been redeemable at face-value, sometimes with interest, in gold or silver not less than "six months after the ratification of a treaty of peace between the Confederate States and the United States of America." As of 15 March 1864, Keatinge & Ball was pledging $1 in Confederate currency in exchange for $5 of its scrip; but, on that date, about CS$26 was required to purchase the amount of gold that could have been obtained for US$1 on 1 January 1861. This transformation of public debt into private currency is not uncommon; and such, as it seems, were the methods of finance that were frequently improvised under the Confederate régime of war-socialism (that is, of Kriegssozialismus, to use the term which designated the economic policies, in another era, in another locale, and in another war, of Erich von Ludendorff and Paul von Hindenburg). It was, indeed, the Confederate States of America which were the world's first socialist country. About this, see Raimondo Luraghi (Università di Genova), The Rise and Fall of the Plantation South (New York, New Viewpoints: 1978). Luraghi, emeritus professor of American history at the University of Genoa, is an Italian Marxist.

The irony of Keatinge & Ball's printing its own money — quoted at the rate of two dollars in Confederate treasury bills for ten dollars in private scrip, a ratio of one to five for the official notes of its own engraving — is nothing if not delicious. It certainly provides an attractive example, in the history of finance, of the workings of Gresham's Law.

   

''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

 

GENEALOGICAL NOTES AND ANECDOTES: TABLE OF CONTENTS

GENEALOGICAL NOTES AND ANECDOTES: HOME