| |

GENEALOGICAL
NOTES AND ANECDOTES

| |
Bury the
purple dream
Of the America we have not been,
The tropic empire seeking the warm sea,
The last foray of Aristocracy,
The pastoral rebellion of the earth,
Against machines, against the Age of Steam.
[paraphrased from
Stephen
Vincent Benet,
John Brown's Body]
|
|
ON NEOPURITANISM
By the end of the twentieth century, a species of
neopuritanism had arisen in the United States according
to which many believed it contrary to public good that
anyone should display the banners, emblems, or insignia
of the long-defunct Confederate States of America. The
basis for this point of view is in equation of the
Confederate government with the practice of racial
slavery, a form of human bondage now universally
acknowledged as inconsistent with iustitia naturalis.
At least since the French Revolution, it has been
axiomatic in Western culture that no-one is or can be a
slave, whether by nature or by convention. Thus, in the
New World, and by the nineteenth century, property in man
survived as a vestigial institution of European
colonialism.
Of the eleven states that formed the
Confederacy, argument can be made for saying that it was
in defense of slavery that South Carolina (seceded 20
December 1860), Mississippi (seceded 9 January 1861),
Florida (seceded 10 January 1861), Alabama (seceded 11
January 1861), Georgia (seceded 19 January 1861),
Louisiana (seceded 26 January 1861), and Texas (seceded 1
February 1861), following the election of Abraham Lincoln (6
November 1860) and the threat of Republican ascendancy
("Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men") in the
fedral legislature, undertook secession from the United
States. Argument, however, can also be made for showing
that it was not in defense of slavery that
Virginia (seceded 17 April 1861), Arkansas (seceded 6 May
1861), Tennessee (seceded 7 May 1861), and North Carolina
(seceded 11 May 1861), after Lincolns call
to arms (15 April 1861) against South Carolina, were
moved to depart the United States but that, instead, they
were motivated by the principle of voluntary union.
These last four states contained nearly half the
population of the Confederacy; and, therefore, from its
inception, the Confederate States of America were based
on mixed intentions.

[Map from D. W. Meinig, The Shaping of
America: A Geographical Perspective on 500 Years of
History (New Haven and London: Yale University
Press, 1993), vol. 2, p. 485. This map distinguishes the
Upland South, the Deep South, and the Confederate
Territory of Arizona]
Following the decision of the Supreme Court of the
United States in the case of Dred Scott, Plaintiff in
Error, versus John F. A. Sandford [60 U. S.
393 (December Term, 1856)], in which Justice Taney had
opined that free persons of colour (in Louisiana, gens
de couleur libre) "are not included, and were
not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in
the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the
rights and privileges which that instrument provides for
and secures to citizens of the United States," it
seemed plausible that free persons of colour might be
deprived of liberty without offense to the fifth
amendment of the American constitution. Thus it was that
the decision of the Supreme Court provoked the
"enslavement crisis" of 1858 - 1860 by which,
in the slaveholding states, efforts were made to legalise
the enslavement of free persons of colour. But, since no
political consensus was discovered in support of any such
legislation as would transform freedom into felony, the
doctrine of John C. Calhoun
that, for all persons of colour, slavery must be a
"positive good" was effectively repudiated
throughout the South. [See Michael P. Johnson and James
L. Roark. Black Masters: A Free Family of Color in
the Old South (New York: W. W. Norton, 1984); and
see Ira Berlin, Slaves Without Masters: The Free Negro
in the Antebellum South (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1974).]
If the outcome of the "enslavement crisis"
be taken as a crucial test of the South's alliance with
slavery, then it appears that the defense of slavery was
everywhere equivocal. And this, in the end, is the reason
why Patrick Cleburne, Robert E. Lee, Judah P. Benjamin,
and Jefferson
Davis, with the legislative concurrence of the
Confederate Congress, proved their devotion to the South
over slavery by advocating continuance of their war for
independence on the basis of terminating the
"peculiar institution" of property in man. The
war, however, that originated as a conflict about
secession and not about human bondage, the Union having
provoked hostilities with no plan at all for ending
slavery, reached its conclusion sooner than did "the
peculiar institution." [See Robert F. Durden. The
Gray and the Black: The Confederate Debate on
Emancipation (Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana
State University Press, 1972).]
| |
Georgia, 2 January 1864: Letter
from Patrick Cleburne et al. to Joseph
E, Johnston et al. [The War of the
Rebellion: Official Records of the Union and
Confederate Armies, series I, volume LII, pt.
2 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900),
pp. 586-592.]: [2
January 1864]
COMMANDING GENERAL, THE CORPS,
DIVISION, BRIGADE, AND REGIMENTAL COMMANDERS OF
THE ARMY OF TENNESSEE
General:
Moved by the exigency in which our country is
now placed we take the liberty of laying before
you, unofficially, our views on the present state
of affairs. The subject is so grave, and our
views so new, we feel it a duty both to you and
the cause that before going further we should
submit them for your judgment and receive your
suggestions in regard to them. We therefore
respectfully ask you to give us an expression of
your views in the premises. We have now been
fighting for nearly three years, have spilled
much of our best blood, and lost, consumed, or
thrown to the flames an amount of property equal
in value to the specie currency of the world.
Through some lack in our system the fruits of our
struggles and sacrifices have invariably slipped
away from us and left us nothing but long lists
of dead and mangled. Instead of standing
defiantly on the borders of our territory or
harassing those of the enemy, we are hemmed in
to-day into less than two-thirds of it, and still
the enemy menacingly confronts us at every point
with superior forces. Our soldiers can see no end
to this state of affairs except in our own
exhaustion; hence, instead of rising to the
occasion, they are sinking into a fatal apathy,
growing weary of hardships and slaughters which
promise no results. In this state of things it is
easy to understand why there is a growing belief
that some black catastrophe is not far ahead of
us, and that unless some extraordinary change is
soon made in our condition we must overtake it.
The consequences of this condition are showing
themselves more plainly every day; restlessness
of morals spreading everywhere, manifesting
itself in the army in a growing disregard for
private rights; desertion spreading to a class of
soldiers it never dared to tamper with before;
military commissions sinking in the estimation of
the soldier; our supplies failing; our firesides
in ruins. If this state continues much longer we
must be subjugated. Every man should endeavor to
understand the meaning of subjugation before it
is too late. We can give but a faint idea when we
say it means the loss of all we now hold most
sacred slaves and all other personal
property, lands, homesteads, liberty, justice,
safety, pride, manhood. It means that the history
of this heroic struggle will be written by the
enemy; that our youth will be trained by Northern
school teachers; will learn from Northern school
books their version of the war; will be impressed
by all the influences of history and education to
regard our gallant dead as traitors, our maimed
veterans as fit objects for derision. It means
the crushing of Southern manhood, the hatred of
our former slaves, who will, on a spy system, be
our secret police. The conqueror's policy is to
divide the conquered into factions and stir up
animosity among them, and in training an army of
negroes the North no doubt holds this thought in
perspective. We can see three great causes
operating to destroy us: First, the inferiority
of our armies to those of the enemy in point of
numbers; second, the poverty of our single source
of supply in comparison with his several sources;
third, the fact that slavery, from being one of
our chief sources of strength at the commencement
of the war, has now become, in a military point
of view, one of our chief sources of weakness.
The enemy already opposes us at every point
with superior numbers, and is endeavoring to make
the preponderance irresistible. President Davis,
in his recent message, says the enemy "has
recently ordered a large conscription and made a
subsequent call for volunteers, to be followed,
if ineffectual by a still further draft." In
addition, the President of the United States
announces that "he has already in training
an army of 100,000 negroes as good as any
troops," and every fresh raid he makes and
new slice of territory he wrests from us will add
to this force. Every soldier in our army already
knows and feels our numerical inferiority to the
enemy. Want of men in the field has prevented him
from reaping the fruits of his victories, and has
prevented him from having the furlough he
expected after the last reorganization, and when
he turns from the wasting armies in the field to
look at the source of supply, he finds nothing in
the prospect to encourage him. Our single source
of supply is that portion of our white men fit
for duty and not now in the ranks. The enemy has
three sources of supply: First, his own motley
population; secondly, our slaves; and thirdly,
Europeans whose hearts are fired into a crusade
against us by fictitious pictures of the
atrocities of slavery, and who meet no hindrance
from their Governments in such enterprise,
because these Governments are equally
antagonistic to the institution. In touching the
third cause, the fact that slavery has become a
military weakness, we may rouse prejudice and
passion, but the time has come when it would be
madness not to look at our danger from every
point of view, and to probe it to the bottom.
Apart from the assistance that home and foreign
prejudice against slavery has given to the North,
slavery is a source of great strength to the
enemy in a purely military point of view, by
supplying him with an army from our granaries;
but it is our most vulnerable point, a continued
embarrassment, and in some respects an insidious
weakness. Wherever slavery is once seriously
disturbed, whether by the actual presence or the
approach of the enemy, or even by a cavalry raid,
the whites can no longer with safety to their
property openly sympathize with our cause. The
fear of their slaves is continually haunting
them, and from silence and apprehension many of
these soon learn to wish the war stopped on any
terms. The next stage is to take the oath to save
property, and they become dead to us, if not open
enemies. To prevent raids we are forced to
scatter our forces, and are not free to move and
strike like the enemy; his vulnerable points are
carefully selected and fortified depots. Ours are
found in every point where there is a slave to
set free. All along the lines slavery is
comparatively valueless to us for labor, but of
great and increasing worth to the enemy for
information. It is an omnipresent spy system,
pointing out our valuable men to the enemy,
revealing our positions, purposes, and resources,
and yet acting so safely and secretly that there
is no means to guard against it. Even in the
heart of our country, where our hold upon this
secret espionage is firmest, it waits but the
opening fire of the enemy's battle line to wake
it, like a torpid serpent, into venomous
activity.
In view of the state of affairs what does our
country propose to do? In the words of President
Davis "no effort must be spared to add
largely to our effective force as promptly as
possible. The sources of supply are to be found
in restoring to the army all who are improperly
absent, putting an end to substitution, modifying
the exemption law, restricting details, and
placing in the ranks such of the able-bodied men
now employed as wagoners, nurses, cooks, and
other employe[e]s, as are doing service for which
the negroes may be found competent." Most of
the men improperly absent, together with many of
the exempts and men having substitutes, are now
without the Confederate lines and cannot be
calculated on. If all the exempts capable of
bearing arms were enrolled, it will give us the
boys below eighteen, the men above forty-five,
and those persons who are left at home to meet
the wants of the country and the army, but this
modification of the exemption law will remove
from the fields and manufactories most of the
skill that directed agricultural and mechanical
labor, and, as stated by the President,
"details will have to be made to meet the
wants of the country," thus sending many of
the men to be derived from this source back to
their homes again. Independently of this,
experience proves that striplings and men above
conscript age break down and swell the sick lists
more than they do the ranks. The portion now in
our lines of the class who have substitutes is
not on the whole a hopeful element, for the
motives that created it must have been stronger
than patriotism, and these motives added to what
many of them will call breach of faith, will
cause some to be not forthcoming, and others to
be unwilling and discontented soldiers. The
remaining sources mentioned by the President have
been so closely pruned in the Army of Tennessee
that they will be found not to yield largely. The
supply from all these sources, together with what
we now have in the field, will exhaust the white
race, and though it should greatly exceed
expectations and put us on an equality with the
enemy, or even give us temporary advantages,
still we have no reserve to meet unexpected
disaster or to supply a protracted struggle. Like
past years, 1864 will diminish our ranks by the
casualties of war, and what source of repair is
there left us? We therefore see in the
recommendations of the President only a temporary
expedient, which at the best will leave us twelve
months hence in the same predicament we are in
now. The President attempts to meet only one of
the depressing causes mentioned; for the other
two he has proposed no remedy. They remain to
generate lack of confidence in our final success,
and to keep us moving down hill as heretofore.
Adequately to meet the causes which are now
threatening ruin to our country, we propose, in
addition to a modification of the President's
plans, that we retain in service for the war all
troops now in service, and that we immediately
commence training a large reserve of the most
courageous of our slaves, and further that we
guarantee freedom within a reasonable time to
every slave in the South who shall remain true to
the Confederacy in this war. As between the loss
of independence and the loss of slavery, we
assume that every patriot will freely give up the
latter give up the negro slave rather than
be a slave himself. If we are correct in this
assumption it only remains to show how this great
national sacrifice is, in all human
probabilities, to change the current of success
and sweep the invader from our country.
Our country has already some friends in
England and France, and there are strong motives
to induce these nations to recognize and assist
us, but they cannot assist us without helping
slavery, and to do this would be in conflict with
their policy for the last quarter of a century.
England has paid hundreds of millions to
emancipate her West India slaves and break up the
slave-trade. Could she now consistently spend her
treasure to reinstate slavery in this country?
But this barrier once removed, the sympathy and
the interests of these and other nations will
accord with our own, and we may expect from them
both moral support and material aid. One thing is
certain, as soon as the great sacrifice to
independence is made and known in foreign
countries there will be a complete change of
front in our favor of the sympathies of the
world. This measure will deprive the North of the
moral and material aid which it now derives from
the bitter prejudices with which foreigners view
the institution, and its war, if continued, will
henceforth be so despicable in their eyes that
the source of recruiting will be dried up. It
will leave the enemy's negro army no motive to
fight for, and will exhaust the source from which
it has been recruited. The idea that it is their
special mission to war against slavery has held
growing sway over the Northern people for many
years, and has at length ripened into an armed
and bloody crusade against it. This baleful
superstition has so far supplied them with a
courage and constancy not their own. It is the
most powerful and honestly entertained plank in
their war platform. Knock this away and what is
left? A bloody ambition for more territory, a
pretended veneration for the Union, which one of
their own most distinguished orators (Doctor
Beecher in his Liverpool speech) openly avowed
was only used as a stimulus to stir up the
anti-slavery crusade, and lastly the poisonous
and selfish interests which are the fungus growth
of the war itself. Mankind may fancy it a great
duty to destroy slavery, but what interest can
mankind have in upholding this remainder of the
Northern war platform? Their interests and
feelings will be diametrically opposed to it. The
measure we propose will strike dead all John
Brown fanaticism, and will compel the enemy to
draw off altogether or in the eyes of the world
to swallow the Declaration of Independence
without the sauce and disguise of philanthropy.
This delusion of fanaticism at an end, thousands
of Northern people will have leisure to look at
home and to see the gulf of despotism into which
they themselves are rushing.
The measure will at one blow strip the enemy
of foreign sympathy and assistance, and transfer
them to the South; it will dry up two of his
three sources of recruiting; it will take from
his negro army the only motive it could have to
fight against the South, and will probably cause
much of it to desert over to us; it will deprive
his cause of the powerful stimulus of fanaticism,
and will enable him to see the rock on which his
so-called friends are now piloting him. The
immediate effect of the emancipation and
enrollment of negroes on the military strength of
the South would be: To enable us to have armies
numerically superior to those of the North, and a
reserve of any size we might think necessary; to
enable us to take the offensive, move forward,
and forage on the enemy. It would open to us in
prospective another and almost untouched source
of supply, and furnish us with the means of
preventing temporary disaster, and carrying on a
protracted struggle. It would instantly remove
all the vulnerability, embarrassment, and
inherent weakness which result from slavery. The
approach of the enemy would no longer find every
household surrounded by spies; the fear that
sealed the master's lips and the avarice that
has, in so many cases, tempted him practically to
desert us would alike be removed. There would be
no recruits awaiting the enemy with open arms, no
complete history of every neighborhood with ready
guides, no fear of insurrection in the rear, or
anxieties for the fate of loved ones when our
armies moved forward. The chronic irritation of
hope deferred would be joyfully ended with the
negro, and the sympathies of his whole race would
be due to his native South. It would restore
confidence in an early termination of the war
with all its inspiring consequences, and even if
contrary to all expectations the enemy should
succeed in over-running the South, instead of
finding a cheap, ready-made means of holding it
down, he would find a common hatred and thirst
for vengeance, which would break into acts at
every favorable opportunity, would prevent him
from settling on our lands, and render the South
a very unprofitable conquest. It would remove
forever all selfish taint from our cause and
place independence above every question of
property. The very magnitude of the sacrifice
itself, such as no nation has ever voluntarily
made before, would appal [sic] our
enemies, destroy his spirit and his finances, and
fill our hearts with a pride and singleness of
purpose which would clothe us with new strength
in battle. Apart from all other aspects of the
question, the necessity for more fighting men is
upon us. We can only get a sufficiency by making
the negro share the danger and hardships of the
war. If we arm and train him and make him fight
for the country in her hour of dire distress,
every consideration of principle and policy
demand that we should set him and his whole race
who side with us free. It is a first principle
with mankind that he who offers his life in
defense of the State should receive from her in
return his freedom and his happiness, and we
believe in acknowledgment of this principle. The
Constitution of the Southern States has reserved
to their respective governments the power to free
slaves for meritorious services to the State. It
is politic besides. For many years, ever since
the agitation of the subject of slavery
commenced, the negro has been dreaming of
freedom, and his vivid imagination has surrounded
that condition with so many gratifications that
it has become the paradise of his hopes. To
attain it he will tempt dangers and difficulties
not exceeded by the bravest soldier in the field.
The hope of freedom is perhaps the only moral
incentive that can be applied to him in his
present condition. It would be preposterous then
to expect him to fight against it with any degree
of enthusiasm, therefore we must bind him to our
cause by no doubtful bonds; we must leave no
possible loop-hole for treachery to creep in. The
slaves are dangerous now, but armed, trained, and
collected in an army they would be a thousand
fold more dangerous; therefore when we make
soldiers of them we must make free men of them
beyond all question, and thus enlist their
sympathies also. We can do this more effectually
than the North can now do, for we can give the
negro not only his own freedom, but that of his
wife and child, and can secure it to him in his
old home. To do this, we must immediately make
his marriage and parental relations sacred in the
eyes of the law and forbid their sale. The past
legislation of the South concedes that a large
free middle class of negro blood, between the
master and slave, must sooner or later destroy
the institution. If, then, we touch the
institution at all, we would do best to make the
most of it, and by emancipating the whole race
upon reasonable terms, and within such reasonable
time as will prepare both races for the change,
secure to ourselves all the advantages, and to
our enemies all the disadvantages that can arise,
both at home and abroad, from such a sacrifice.
Satisfy the negro that if he faithfully adheres
to our standard during the war he shall receive
his freedom and that of his race. Give him as an
earnest of our intentions such immediate
immunities as will impress him with our sincerity
and be in keeping with his new condition, enroll
a portion of his class as soldiers of the
Confederacy, and we change the race from a
dreaded weakness to a position of strength.
Will the slaves fight? The helots of Sparta
stood their masters good stead in battle. In the
great sea fight of Lepanto where the Christians
checked forever the spread of Mohammedanism over
Europe, the galley slaves of portions of the
fleet were promised freedom, and called on to
fight at a critical moment of the battle. They
fought well, and civilization owes much to those
brave galley slaves. The negro slaves of Saint
Domingo, fighting for freedom, defeated their
white masters and the French troops sent against
them. The negro slaves of Jamaica revolted, and
under the name of Maroons held the mountains
against their masters for 150 years; and the
experience of this war has been so far that
half-trained negroes have fought as bravely as
many other half-trained Yankees. If, contrary to
the training of a lifetime, they can be made to
face and fight bravely against their former
masters, how much more probable is it that with
the allurement of a higher reward, and led by
those masters, they would submit to discipline
and face dangers?
We will briefly notice a few arguments against
this course. It is said Republicanism cannot
exist without the institution. Even were this
true, we prefer any form of government of which
the Southern people may have the molding, to one
forced upon us by a conqueror. It is said the
white man cannot perform agricultural labor in
the South. The experience of this army during the
heat of summer from Bowling Green, Ky., to
Tupelo, Miss., is that the white man is healthier
when doing reasonable work in the open field than
at any other time. It is said an army of negroes
cannot be spared from the fields. A sufficient
number of slaves is now administering to luxury
alone to supply the place of all we need, and we
believe it would be better to take half the
able-bodied men off a plantation than to take the
one master mind that economically regulated its
operations. Leave some of the skill at home and
take some of the muscle to fight with. It is said
slaves will not work after they are freed. We
think necessity and a wise legislation will
compel them to labor for a living. It is said it
will cause terrible excitement and some
disaffection from our cause. Excitement is far
preferable to the apathy which now exists, and
disaffection will not be among the fighting men.
It is said slavery is all we are fighting for,
and if we give it up we give up all. Even if this
were true, which we deny, slavery is not all our
enemies are fighting for. It is merely the
pretense to establish sectional superiority and a
more centralized form of government, and to
deprive us of our rights and liberties. We have
now briefly proposed a plan which we believe will
save our country. It may be imperfect, but in all
human probability it would give us our
independence. No objection ought to outweigh it
which is not weightier than independence. If it
is worthy of being put in practice it ought to be
mooted quickly before the people, and urged
earnestly by every man who believes in its
efficacy. Negroes will require much training;
training will require much time, and there is
danger that this concession to common sense may
come too late.
| |
P. R. Cleburne, major-general,
commanding division
D. C. Govan, brigadier-general
John E. Murray, colonel, Fifth
Arkansas
G. F. Baucum, colonel, Eighth Arkansas
Peter Snyder, lieutenant-colonel,
commanding Sixth and Seventh Arkansas
E. Warfield, lieutenant-colonel,
Second Arkansas
M. P. Lowrey, brigadier-general
A. B. Hardcastle, colonel,
Thirty-second and Forty-fifth Mississippi
F. A. Ashford, major, Sixteenth
Alabama
John W. Colquitt, colonel, First
Arkansas
Rich. J. Person, major, Third and
Fifth Confederate
G. S. Deakins, major, Thirty-fifth and
Eighth Tennessee
J. H. Collett, captain, commanding
Seventh Texas
J. H. Kelly, brigadier-general,
commanding Cavalry Division |
|
23 March
1865: Confederate States of America, General Order No.
14: The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of the
Union and Confederate Armies, series IV, volume III
(Washington: Government Printing Office, 1900), pp. 1161
- 1162:
| |
GENERAL ORDERS
No. 14
|
} |
ADJT. AND INSP.
GENERALS OFFICE,
. Richmond, Va., March 23, 1865 |
.I. The following act of Congress and
regulations are published for the information and
direction of all concerned:
| |
AN ACT
to increase the military force of the
Confederate States.
The Congress of the Confederate
States of America do enact, That, in
order to provide additional forces to
repel invasion, maintain the rightful
possession of the Confederate States,
secure their independence, and preserve
their institutions, the President be, and
he is hereby, authorized to ask for and
accept from the owners of slaves, the
services of such number of able-bodied
negro men as he may deem expedient, for
and during the war, to perform military
service in whatever capacity he may
direct.
SEC. 2. That the General-in-Chief be
authorized to organize the said slaves
into companies, battalions, regiments,
and brigades, under such rules and
regulations as the Secretary of War may
prescribe, and to be commanded by such
officers as the President may appoint.
SEC. 3. That while employed in the
service the said troops shall receive the
same rations, clothing, and compensation
as are allowed to other troops in the
same branch of the service.
SEC. 4. That if, under the previous
sections of this act, the President shall
not be able to raise a sufficient number
of troops to prosecute the war
successfully and maintain the sovereignty
of the States and the independence of the
Confederate States, then he is hereby
authorized to call on each State,
whenever he thinks it expedient, for her
quota of 300,000 troops, in addition to
those subject to military service under
existing laws, or so many thereof as the
President may deem necessary to be raised
from such classes of the population,
irrespective of color, in each State, as
the proper authorities thereof may
determine: Provided, That not more than
twenty-five per cent. of the male slaves
between the ages of eighteen and
forty-five, in anyState, shall be called
for under the provisions of this act.
SEC. 5. That nothing in this act shall
be construed to authorize a change in the
relation which the said slaves shall bear
toward their owners, except by consent of
the owners and of the States in which
they may reside, and in pursuance of the
laws thereof. Approved March 13, 1865.
|
II. The recruiting service under this act will
be conducted under the supervision of the
Adjutant and Inspector General, according to the
regulations for the recruiting service of the
Regular Army, in so far as they are applicable,
and except when special directions may be given
by the War Department.
III. There will be assigned or appointed for
each State an officer who will be charged with
the collection, enrollment, and disposition of
all the recruits that may be obtained under the
first section of this act. One or more general
depots will be established in each State and
announced in orders, and a suitable number of
officers will be detailed for duty in the staff
departments at the depots. There will be assigned
at each general depot a quartermaster,
commissary, and surgeon, and the headquarters of
the superintendent will be at the principal depot
in the State. The proper officers to aid the
superintendent in enlisting, mustering, and
organizing the recruits will be assigned by
orders from this office or by the
General-in-Chief.
IV. The enlistment of colored persons under
this act will be made upon printed forms, to be
furnished for the purpose, similar to those
established for the regular service. They will be
executed in duplicate, one copy to be returned to
this office for file. No slave will be accepted
as a recruit unless with his own consent and with
the approbation of his master by a written
instrument conferring, as far as he may, the
rights of a freedman, and which will be filed
with the superintendent. The enlistments will be
made for the war, and the effect of the
enlistment will be to place the slave in the
military service conformably to this act. The
recruits will be organized at the camps in squads
and companies, and will be subject to the orders
of the General-in-Chief nuder the second section
of this act.
V. The superintendent in each State will cause
a report to be made on the first Monday of every
month showing the expenses of the previous month,
the number of recruits at the various depots in
the State, the number that has been sent away,
and the destination of each. His report will show
the names of all the slaves, recruited, with
their age, description, and the names of their
masters. One copy will be sent to the
General-in-Chief and one to the Adjutant and
Inspector General.
VI. The appointment of officers to the
companies to be formed of the recruits aforesaid
will be made by the President.
VII. To facilitate the raising of volunteer
companies, officers recruiting therefor are
authorized to muster their men into service as
soon as enrolled. As soon as enrolled and
mustered, the men will be sent, with descriptive
lists, to the depots of rendezvous, at which they
will be instructed until assigned for service in
the field. When the organization of any company
remains incomplete at the expiration of the time
specified for its organization, the companies or
detachments already mustered into service will be
assigned to other organizations at the discretion
of the General-in-Chief.
VIII. It is not the intention of the President
to grant any authority for raising regiments or
brigades. The only organizations to be perfected
at the depots or camps of instructions are those
of companies and (in exceptional cases where the
slaves are of one estate) of battalions
consisting of four companies, and the only
authority to be issued will be for the raising of
companies or the aforesaid special battalions of
four companies. All larger organizations will be
left for future action as experience may
determine.
IX. All officers who may be employed in the
recruiting service, under the provisions of this
act, or who may be appointed to the command of
troops raised under it, or who may hold any staff
appoint- ment in connection with them, are
enjoined to a provident, considerate, and humane
attention to whatever concerns the health,
comfort, instruction, and discipline of those
troops, and to the uniform observance of
kindness, forbearance, and indulgence in their
treatment of them, and especially that they will
protect them from injustice and oppression.
By order: S. COOPER, Adjutant
and Inspector General.
|
The principle embodied in the letter from
Patrick Cleburne et al. to Joseph E, Johnston et
al. and in CSA General Order No. 14 is that, since
courage is a virtue inconsistent with slavery, no person
exercising valor in defense of his country may justly be
deemed a slave.
In contrast to CSA General Order No. 14,
authorised by President Jefferson
Davis, USA General Order No. 11, issued by Maj. Gen.
Ulysses Simpson Grant from Holly Springs, Mississippi on
17 December 1862 deserves serious reflection [The War of the Rebellion:
Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies,
series I, volume XVII, part II (Washington: Government
Printing Office, 1900), p. 424]:
GENERAL ORDERS
No. 11
|
} |
HDQRS. 13TH A. C., DEPT. OF THE
TENN.,
. Holly Springs, December 17, 1862 |
| |
The Jews, as a class violating every regulation
of trade established by the Treasury Department
and also department orders, are hereby expelled
from the department (that is, from the Union's
military Department of the Tennessee which
included Kentucky, Tennesse, and Mississippi)
within twenty-four hours from the receipt of this
order.Post commanders will see that all of
this class of people be furnished passes and
required to leave, and any one returning after
such notification will be arrested and held in
confinement until an opportunity occurs of
sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished
with permit from headquarters.
No passes will be given these people to visit
headquarters for the purpose of making personal
application for trade permits.
By order of Maj. Gen. U. S. Grant:
JNO. A. RAWLINS, Assistant
Adjutant-General.
|
Grant's General Order No. 11 came in the
aftermath of an order that, from LaGrange, Mississippi,
he had issued 10 November 1862 [The War of the Rebellion: Official Records of
the Union and Confederate Armies, series I, volume
XVII, part II (Washington: Government Printing Office,
1900), p. 337]:
| |
LA GRANGE, November
10, 1862.
General WEBSTER, Jackson, Tenn.:
Give orders to all the conductors
on the road that no Jews are to be permitted to
travel on the railroad southward from any point.
They may go north and be encouraged in it; but
they are such an intolerable nuisance that the
department must be purged of them.
U. S. GRANT,
Major-General
|
About Grant's directives against Jews,
comment hardly seems necessary.
On 14 May 1865, from the doorstep of his
father's house in Augusta, Georgia, Thomas Woodrow Wilson,
then eight years of age, was an eyewitness to the forced
transportation of Jefferson Davis
and Alexander Stephens, both as captives of the Union
army, to their sites of military imprisonment, Davis at
Fortress Monroe and Stephens at Fort Warren. And it was
Wilson who, as a child of the Confederacy and as the 28th
president of the United States, conveyed the permanent
legacy of the Confederate States to the world as a whole
by his enunciation, in 1918, of the principle of
self-determination for all nations, without annexation
and without indemnity, and by his effort to
institutionalise that principle in the League of Nations.
From the record, thus, of the twentieth century, marked
as it was by numerous wars of national liberation, it is
clear that the principle of self-determination
which was the constant aim of the Confederate
government as the maintenance of slavery was not
was and has been a force vastly more potent throughout
the world than, for example, were the global imperatives
of Marxism-Leninism.

As is mentioned elsewhere at this Web
site, there was a connection of family between John Calhoun Cox, whose name, in
the annals of the Fifth Texas Regiment, Hoods
Brigade, is synonymous with courage, and Gen. John Brown
Gordon, the hero of Confederate Georgia who, among
other things, was the commander and patron of Basil
Lanneau Gildersleeve, the exemplar of classical
scholarship and the founder, at Johns Hopkins University,
of the American Philological Association.
The following remarks, concerning the display of
Confederate banners, are taken from John Brown Gordon, Reminiscences
of the Civil War (New York, Charles Scribner's:
1904):
| |
"The heartstrings of the
mother, woven around the grave of her lost child,
will never be severed while she lives; but does
that hinder the continued flow of maternal
devotions to those who are left her? The South's
affections are bound, with links that cannot be
broken, around the graves of her sons who fell in
her defense and to the mementos and memories of
the great struggle; but does that fact lessen her
loyalty to the proud emblem of a reunited
country? Does her unparalleled defense of the now
dead Confederacy argue less readiness to battle
for the ever-living Republic, in the making and
the administering of which she bore so
conspicuous a part?
"If those unhappy patriots who find a
scarecrow in every faded, riddled Confederate
flag would delve deeper into the philosophy of
human nature, or rise higher, say to the plane on
which McKinley stood, they would be better
satisfied with their Southern countrymen, with
Southern sentiment, with the breadth and strength
of the unobtrusive but sincere Southern
patriotism. They would see that man is so
constituted, the immutable laws of our being are
such, that to stifle the sentiment and extinguish
the hallowed memories of a people is to destroy
their manhood.
"The unseemly things which occurred in the
great conflict between the States should be
forgotten, or at least forgiven, and no longer
permitted to disturb complete harmony between
North and South. All American youth in all
sections should be taught to hold in perpetual
remembrance all that was great and good on both
sides; to comprehend the inherited convictions
for which saintly women suffered and patriotic
men died; to recognize the unparalleled carnage
as proof of unrivaled courage; to appreciate the
singular absence of all personal animosity and
the frequent manifestation between those brave
antagonists of a good-fellowship such as had
never before been witnessed between hostile
armies. It will be a glorious day for our country
when all the children within its borders shall
learn that four years of fratricidal war between
the North and the South was waged by neither with
criminal or unworthy intent, but by both to
protect what they conceived to be threatened
rights and imperiled liberty; that the issues
which divided the sections were born when the
Republic was born, and were forever buried in an
ocean of fraternal blood."
|
|
OLD
FORT PLANTATION:
FROM BONDAGE TO FREEDOM

OLD FORT PLANTATION,
FOUR MILES FROM BEAUFORT, SOUTH CAROLINA, MARCH
1862
[United States Library of Congress: LC-B8171-152-A]
In March 1862, Timothy H.
O'Sullivan photographed this family of slaves at
Old Fort Plantation in Beaufort County, South
Carolina. By the martial decree of Abraham
Lincoln, this family
was emancipated on 1 January 1863.
The proprietor of Old Fort
Plantation was John Joyner Smith, who was born in
South Carolina in 1789.
About John Joyner Smith, from
Robert E. H. Peeples, An Index to Hilton Head
Island Names (Before the Contemporary
Development), p. 23:
"The underwater sand
bar, exposed at low tide, which extends
outward into the Atlantic from the
northeastern corner of Hilton Head, has long
been designated Joyner Bank in honor of sea
Captain John Joiner who died March 9, 1796 at
his plantation near Beaufort. He had moved to
Carolina from Frederica, Georgia in 1750 and
was in command of a scout boat from 1754
until the boats were no longer necessary at
which time he became a planter. St.
Helenas Parish Register records that
his wife Phebe (from England) died of
poison in July 1754 and that he
married in January 1755 Anne, daughter of
Captain Richard and Anne Wigg; she
predeceased him by two days. Although he had
several sons and daughters, he left only one
grandchild, John Joyner Smith, by a daughter
Margaret who married Archibold Smith in 1789
and died in 1795. John Joyner Smith married
in 1813 Mary Gibbes Barnwell (1 February 1795
- 31 December 1853), eldest daughter of Col.
Edward Barnwell, and built a magnificent home
on the bay which remains one of
Beauforts treasurers; they died
childless. A map drawn by James Cook in 1766
notes that it was 'approved by Mr. Joiner (sic),
twenty years a pilot in that place.'"
As of 1 June 1860, John Joyner
Smith estimated the value of his real estate at
$25,000 and of his personal estate at $50,000.
His slaves were numbered at 86 males, ranging in
age from 1 to 80 years, and at 88 females,
ranging in age from 1 to 72 years. The principal
crop at Old Fort Plantation was cotton.

OLD FORT
PLANTATION, 1863
[United States Library of Congress: PR-002-347.20]
The house pictured
above is not the "magnificent home on the
bay" that Peeples mentioned in An Index
to Hilton Head Island Names. The
"magnificent home" is located, in
Beaufort, at 400 Wilmington Street and was
formerly entered through its façade on Bay
Street. The house at Old Fort Plantation is no
longer extant. "Old Fort" refers to
Fort Frederick, constructed by the British Army
in 1735 for the defense of Port Royal Harbour.
The dilapidated walls of Fort Frederick can still
be seen on what had been the plantation of John
Joyner Smith. Since 29 April 1949, the site has
been occupied by the United States Naval
Hospital, Beaufort, South Carolina.

Detail of the Map of Port Royal Harbour
by James Cook (1773)
[James Cook, A Map of the Province of South
Carolina with all the Rivers, Creeks, Bays,
Inletts, Islands, Inland Navigation, Soundings,
Time of High Water on the Sea Coast, Roads,
Marshes, Ferrys, Bridges, Swamps, Parishes
Churches, Towns, Townships; Country Parish
District and Provincial Lines. Humbly
inscribed to the Hon.ble Lawlins Lownds Esqr.1
Speaker & the rest of the Members of the
Hon.ble the Commons House of Assembly of the
Province by their most Obedt. & faithfull
Servt Jams Cook. Thos. Bowen, sculpt. 1773. (with
six inset maps)]
1. Hon.ble
Lawlins Lownds Esqr.: "Hon.ble
Lawlins Lownds Esqr." was Rawlins Lowndes,
Chief Justice of the Royal Province of South
Carolina and second President of the State of
South Carolina, about whom see The
War of Regulation: John Harvey versus
David Robinson.
|
EMBLEMS OF HUMAN
BONDAGE

A Relic of Urban Slavery:
Slave Tag No. 508, Issued in Charleston, South Carolina
in 1821
Image courtesy of the South Carolina State Museum
 
Another Relic of Urban Slavery:
Slave Tag Stamped for a "House Servant" in
1800, Obverse and Reverse Views
Images by Bill Ladd
| This octagonal slave tag, stamped on copper,
was discovered by Bill Ladd in the yard of his
home in South Carolina in the summer of 1982. The
reverse of the tag is stamped "ATMAR,"
the mark of Ralph Atmar, Jr. who, in Charleston,
operated as a silversmith from 1793 to 1803 in
partnership with James Monk as the firm of Atmar
& Monk which, in 1799, was located at 20
Broad Street. Atmar was born 16 December 1767 in
Charleston of parents who had emigrated from
Kingston-upon-Hull, England. On 4 June 1792, he
was married to Elizabeth Freer (27 April 1773,
Charleston, South Carolina - 1812, Charleston,
South Carolina), in Charleston, at the
Independent Congregational Church. Atmar died in
Charleston in 1807. |
CONFEDERATE
SCRIP

Confederate Note, Montgomery
Issue, No. 265, Issued 2 May 1861
[Criswell Type 4]
This early example of Confederate scrip
was engraved and printed by the National Bank Note
Company of New York to a quantity of 1606.

The central image, which depicts slaves
hoeing cotton, shows that the Confederacy had few
reservations, if any, about advertising the basis of its
wealth. And, as it is altogether clear, had there been no
money in it, no-one would ever have practiced slavery.

Confederate Interest-Bearing
Note, Richmond Issue, No. 108723, Issued 15 December 1862
[Criswell Type 41]
This later example of Confederate scrip
was engraved and printed by Keatinge and Ball, Columbia,
South Carolina to an approximate quantity of 678,600. The
precise quantity is arguable. For this note, denominated
at $100, interest was to be paid at the rate of two cents
per day.

The central image was copied from that
employed previously by the National Bank Note Company of
New York for the Montgomery issue of $100. The copy is
not exact.

The image, at the lower left, is of the
very grim John Caldwell Calhoun,
commonly regarded as the source of the Confederacy's
essential principles. He was, in fact, the namesake of John Calhoun Cox.

The image, on the right, is of Columbia
bearing the wreath of victory, a symbol of the
Confederacy's aspirations to independence.

Private Scrip, No. 19A,
Issued by Keatinge & Ball
Columbia, South Carolina, 15 March 1864
Keatinge & Ball, the
principal engraver to the Confederate treasury
and post office, evidently dealt with the problem
of fiat-money inflation by printing its own
currency the nominal value of which appears to
have been supported by its holdings of
Confederate treasury notes which, in theory,
should have been redeemable at face-value,
sometimes with interest, in gold or silver not
less than "six months after the ratification
of a treaty of peace between the Confederate
States and the United States of America." As
of 15 March 1864, Keatinge & Ball was
pledging $1 in Confederate currency in exchange
for $5 of its scrip; but, on that date, about
CS$26 was required to purchase the amount of gold
that could have been obtained for US$1 on 1
January 1861. This transformation of public debt
into private currency is not uncommon; and such,
as it seems, were the methods of finance that
were frequently improvised under the Confederate
régime of war-socialism (that is, of Kriegssozialismus,
to use the term which designated the economic
policies, in another era, in another locale, and
in another war, of Erich von Ludendorff and Paul
von Hindenburg). It was, indeed, the Confederate
States of America which were the world's first
socialist country. About this, see Raimondo
Luraghi (Università di Genova), The Rise and
Fall of the Plantation South (New York, New
Viewpoints: 1978). Luraghi, emeritus professor of
American history at the University of Genoa, is
an Italian Marxist.
The irony of Keatinge &
Ball's printing its own money quoted at
the rate of two dollars in Confederate treasury
bills for ten dollars in private scrip, a ratio
of one to five for the official notes of its own
engraving is nothing if not delicious. It
certainly provides an attractive example, in the
history of finance, of the workings of Gresham's
Law.
|
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
GENEALOGICAL
NOTES AND ANECDOTES: TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENEALOGICAL
NOTES AND ANECDOTES: HOME
|
|